More than a design guide, the Reactive Manifesto triggered a shift in how developers approach time, failure, control, and team dynamics. This post traces its deeper impact — across technical, philosophical, psychological, and cultural lines.
Architecture isn’t just technical — it’s psychological, cultural, and historical. This piece explores how ideas like Conway’s Law, DDD, and platform thinking reshaped problem decomposition and organisational design.
This post explores the deep impact of Moseley and Marks’ work on software architecture, drawing out its technical, historical, philosophical, and cultural significance.
Most teams don’t fail because the people are bad. They fail because the system they’re in makes doing the right thing harder than it should be. You’ve seen it before. Talented engineers grinding away, frustrated by endless blockers. Architecture that’s more cage than canvas. Leadership that says “go fast” but needs a meeting for every change. That’s not a team problem. That’s an org design problem. The API Memo That Changed the Internet In the early 2000s, Jeff Bezos sent a now-famous internal memo to every team at Amazon: ...